The Stormwater Blogs

SW Editor's Blog

July 14th, 2008 1:35pm PST

Simplifying Public Outreach

Posted By Janice Kaspersen 2 Comments
Public outreach is one of those areas of the NPDES Phase II permit that stormwater program managers either seem to enjoy or to hate, with very little middle ground. In places where people already have a good appreciation of water resources and the need to protect them—places where recreational activities center around beaches or lakes, or where the local economy is dependent on fishing, tourism, or other water-centered activities—it often seems that public education and outreach are almost redundant. In others—inland communities and environments where rain is infrequent—they more often seem to be viewed as a chore. And yet many programs are doing them successfully.

The Environmental Protection Agency has set up a sort of clearinghouse to help stormwater programs find outreach materials. Creating your own materials, whether for print media, radio and television, or the Web, can be expensive and difficult to do well. (For an overview of what’s involved see our guest editorial from the March-April 2006 issue). For this reason, many adjacent communities, or those under a joint Phase II permit, have combined resources and money to share public outreach materials, and the EPA’s Web site (www.epa.gov/nps/toolbox) carries this idea further by providing a large selection to choose from. You can search by media format (print, radio, TV, etc.) or by the particular issues you’re trying to address, such as teaching people to pick up after their pets, stop dumping motor oil down the drain, or not overwater their lawns. 

A program in our area, for example, has run a 30-second television spot showing a drop of motor oil falling from an SUV onto a driveway and morphing into a bright yellow plastic duck, which washes into a storm drain, joined by dozens, then hundreds, of other plastic ducks from other sources: cigarette butts, dog waste, and so on. A huge flock of plastic ducks eventually travels to an outfall and then into open water, startling a real duck and a group of swimmers. It’s a great way to illustrate the aggregate effect of nonpoint-source pollution. On the EPA’s site, I learned that the spot was originally developed by the Think Blue program in San Diego and has been used in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area and in Maine, among other places.

Some of the materials available on the site have been developed by the EPA, but most are from local stormwater agencies. The site includes contact information and terms of use for each item.

How is your stormwater program handling public education and outreach? Has anyone used materials from the EPA’s Toolbox?

 

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

ressl

July 16th, 2008 2:28 PM PT

Public education is only one component of a program. Unfortunately some people see it as the end of the program. It also seems to trivilize the technical and more complex issues associated with many of the environmental issues. In preparing public education programs there is a tendency to dumb down technical issues and whe the programs work well (they typically do work well) then the public thinks that is all that is needed and when they talk to their politicians they express that is all and then the politicians don't do more and make getting real solutions done sometimes impossible.

cluebbert

July 23rd, 2008 3:03 PM PT

I was a beta tester on the toolbox and one of my few negative comments is that I felt like EPA should have made an effort to get permissions from the entities to share the "tools" or not put them in the toolbox. Sometimes chasing down someone to give the "OK" to "borrowing" materials is a royal PITA (pain in the ***). I also think that they need to do more to recruit other communities to share their "tools" in the box - it would be great to go to ONE place instead of trying to search the web for them. I recommended a local program I was aware of (another City) and they were included! And what about a variety of materials developed as part of 319 grants? They are OWNED by EPA and that was supposed to be a factor in getting the funding was the ability for other entities to reuse materials, but I don't know of any of the projects from our state being included. Grr... And how about an area for brainstorming ideas? Just because something hasn't been made pretty by a graphic artist yet doesn't mean it isn't a good idea. I lucked out on one grant that I put together and conned a Conservation Dept artist into helping me make the logo I had in my head look awesome so that it tied a whole festival together, but we can't all be so lucky. I do see what ressl is saying in that many communities and elected officials forget that this is only ONE of the six MCMs, but I'd also venture to say that it is the one MCM that ties most of the others together. You can hardly do any of the other without accomplishing at least SOME level of education. Our general permit bascially requires it. No, it isn't the end all be all, but it is a big piece of the puzzle.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Stormwater E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Stormwater e-mail newsletter!