October 2008

Municipal In-Stream Chemical Monitoring

To speak of many things

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

Biologist with "fixed" DO sample

Additional Article Content

By Lanse Norris

Comments

In my article in the September 2008 issue of Stormwater, I described Cobb County, GA’s municipal in-stream water-quality sampling program and how it is “gratifyingly comprehensive,” promoting regulatory accountability. After a recent water-quality excursion down Atlanta’s Chattahoochee River corridor, I was struck by a whimsical quotation’s nagging relevance to the comprehensive part of that equation, to the eyefuls, awefuls, and incidents of our muddling odyssey. It was not the first time my monitoring efforts were mocked by the chastising irony of “nonsense” rhyme, and a clearer perspective of reorganized reality.

In the soliloquy from Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass, we are called to consciousness (or incomprehension), by the Walrus: “‘The time has come,’ the Walrus said, to talk of many things: of shoes and ships and sealing wax, of cabbages and kings, and why the sea is boiling hot, and whether pigs have wings.” Indeed, the Walrus’s words anticipated environmental boating foibles and ironies we experienced on our cruise, as we often speak of the relative stability of our good ship, the overloaded fishing canoe we swamped without overturning, of our inappropriately casual shoes’ reluctance to return to a dry state, of the sealing wax or lamination that would have preserved my GIS ink copy maps from wet destruction, of the cabbages, other garbage, and trash apparently native to that stretch of urbanized watershed, of the regulatory “kings” that casually commissioned our voyage of the darned, of the turbid and low flowing river’s “boiling” hotter than usual, and yes, whether the pair of feral pigs we saw scamper up the riverbank at greater than pig speed indeed had wings.

Ultimately, once “dried out,” wild water adventures are even more gratifying to the experienced environmental regulator, as their incidence initiates successful apprehension of the many problematic things for which the time often comes to speak, and stand accountable.

Specifically, although chemical sampling and chemistry per se can conjure up things like that junior high science project, “The Wonder of Rust,” or, perhaps, the rousing 14-step Michaelis-Menten proof in senior kinetics, the ideal surface water work-a-day grounds us in practical encounters assessing the physical and chemical natures of water as they influence specific systems of examined aquatic organisms. These encounters are coveted by freshwater stakeholders, from citizen volunteer to environmental field tech to scientist, by those who care to comprehend, and by those who are called at times to speak of many things.

The Physical Properties of Water: What Wet Means
Renaissance Molecule. It behooves us to discuss the versatile physical nature of water as the distribution and success of organisms. The “structural, physiological, and behavioral characteristics displayed by animals living in various habitats” (Pechenik 2000) depend on water’s fluid, solvent, bonding, density, and heat-conveying characteristics. We include temperature and conductivity in the discussion of things characterizing water’s “renaissance molecule” physical nature.

Intuitively, we grasp that water is wet, and so facilitates direct, uncomplicated gas exchange without the risk of desiccation across body walls or gills, vascularized extensions of body walls. Fertilization and development can occur completely and simply in the aquatic environment because many invertebrates freely shed gametes and embryos, unhindered by desiccation and terrestrial-complex systems required to prevent it. Metabolic byproducts like ammonia can be excreted through the body wall of aquatic dwellers into immediate dilution, relinquishing the energy demand and complexity of terrestrial excretory systems. Ammonia is particularly toxic to cellular respiration processes.

Water is a versatile solvent, and invertebrates of all sizes and their embryos can derive soluble organic nutrients and salts by direct uptake. In addition, “as an indirect benefit to aquatic invertebrates, suspension in a nutrient-containing, wet medium permits primary producers to take the form of small, (typically less than 25 µm [micrometers]), suspended, single-celled organisms (phytoplankton); roots are not mandatory. Phytoplankton cells can attain high concentrations in water, and can easily be harvested and ingested by many suspension-feeding aquatic herbivores, including the developmental stages of many invertebrate species” (Pechenik 2000).

Water is denser than air, and it supports structures in small organisms that would collapse on land, such as gill filaments. Water’s density even precludes the need for a skeleton in some organisms. For the same reason, organisms move more efficiently in water, expending little relative energy as buoyancy compensates for gravity. Some invertebrates don’t move at all, feeding on suspended phytoplankton, zooplankton, and dissolved nutrients flowing past in the dense, rich soup. Indeed, this lifestyle “seems to have been exploited only by web-building spiders in the terrestrial habitat” (Pechenik 2000). Fertilization and development are also served by water’s density; external fertilization occurs simply and with little energy expenditure as sperm and egg are suspended in a great nutrient-suspended wet womb. Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Stormwater E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Stormwater e-mail newsletter!