It’s not been a banner year for the world’s water
bodies.
Off of the
California and Oregon coasts, federal regulators issued an unprecedented ban on
commercial and recreational salmon fishing through the remainder of the year.
While the National Marine Fisheries Service points the finger at a lack of
nutrient-rich deep ocean upwellings caused by ocean temperature changes, most
biologists say it goes deeper than that and includes such factors as
agricultural pollution.
A professor in
the Midwest warns that the Lake Erie ecosystem—the predominant of all of the
Great Lakes in terms of the fishing economy—is being threatened by such factors
as harmful algal blooms, aquatic invasive species, a dead zone, sediment
loading, and nutrient loading attributable to phosphorus and nitrogen from point
and nonpoint sources, or sewage and agriculture.
To the east, a
scientist points out that nearly 90% of the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal
tributaries have insufficient levels of dissolved oxygen. Maryland and Virginia
have announced substantial restrictions on commercial and recreational fishing
for crabs because the population is so low.
And to the south,
scientists say that the Gulf Coast dead zone this year will extend west into the
Texas area, primarily because of high discharges from the Mississippi River and
the high concentration of nitrate it contains.
Dead zones are
everywhere: the US Atlantic, the Gulf and Pacific coasts, the Caribbean, Central
and South America, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
Water bodies
suffering from hypoxia and thus dubbed dead zones exist in all parts of the
world, says Robert Diaz, professor of marine science at the College of William
and Mary’s Department of Biological Sciences/Virginia Institute of Marine
Science.
Furthermore,
their numbers are increasing; Diaz estimates nearly 400 dead zones this
year.
“The number is
rising for a couple of reasons,” says Diaz, who recently wrote a paper for the
World Resources Institute titled “Eutrophication and Hypoxia in Coastal Areas: A
Global Assessment of the State of Knowledge.”
“One is that
people are looking for [dead zones] more, so we’re finding more of them. But I
think it’s also due to our systems going lower in oxygen through time,” says
Diaz.
Although natural
processes lower oxygen levels in some areas throughout the world, most of the
European and American dead zones are being driven by eutrophication in coastal
systems.
Eutrophication
occurs when water becomes rich in dissolved nutrients from sewage or
fertilizers. As a result, oxygen-depleting plant life grows, decomposes, and
consequently harms other organisms.
In some dead
zones, the cause is clearly related to sewage and population centers, while
others are related to agricultural land runoff.
“A lot of the
dead zones off of the west coast of South America and Africa are actually
naturally driven oxygen minimum zones and upwelling areas,” says Diaz. “The one
off Oregon’s coast that started about six years ago also is driven by
oceanographic processes, but it may be related to shifting wind patterns and
climate change—but what causes the climate to change?”
Diaz surveys a
map of the United States, listing dead zones and the reasons they
exist.
There’s the
Providence River area in Rhode Island, which includes Narragansett Bay; dead
zones there are linked to Providence’s population centers. Long Island Sound’s
dead zones are attributable to a combination of population, sewerage, and some
agricultural runoff.
To the south in
the Chesapeake Bay, causes are linked not only to agriculture and population,
but also to air deposition, causing eutrophication when air pollution is
deposited directly onto the surface of the water or onto the land, reaching
water through runoff.
In the Pamlico
Sound area off of the coast of North Carolina, agricultural runoff accounts for
most of the dead zones.
To the south near
the Charleston, SC, area, dead zones are most likely due to land development,
Diaz says.
“In the Gulf of
Mexico, [dead zones] seem very clearly linked to what goes on in the Mississippi
Basin, and that’s the primary agricultural region for the US. The dead zone
there fluctuates very predictably with nutrient loadings from the river,” he
explains.
“Then you go
around to some areas in Corpus Christi, Texas—there’s a dead zone there that
could be related to sewage. Some small areas in Galveston Bay seem to be linked
with population and development. On the West Coast in Puget Sound, there’s Hood
Canal, which is like a fjord and is very prone to low oxygen. It’s probably
population development in the watershed that’s driving
that.”
Weather
fluctuations, such as extreme rainfall that flushes more pollutants than normal
into a water body, and also extreme drought that reduces inflows and
concentrates harmful substances in certain water bodies, can also lead to dead
zones.
“When you look at
what creates a dead zone, the biggest thing you need from a physical,
oceanographic point of view is a stratified water column,” says Diaz. “Somehow,
you have to isolate the bottom water from the surface water; it’s the mixing in
the surface that oxygenates the bottom. If you have high stratification due to
either lots of freshwater runoff or high temperatures, then you isolate the
bottom water, and oxygen goes down.”
In the Gulf of
Mexico, which has the largest dead zone in the US, the zone shrinks during
drought conditions, Diaz says. “It’s not that clear in a place like Chesapeake
Bay, where it’s a smaller system—more confined—and the area or volume of hypoxia
is weakly associated with the freshwater runoff,” he adds. “But typically, water
conditions lead to less stratification, which leads to less
hypoxia.”
The
second-largest dead zone in the United States is in Lake Erie in the Great
Lakes. “That’s a stratified water body, but it’s temperature stratification and
it’s on the order of 10,000 square kilometers,” says Diaz.
The causes are
rooted in nutrients, he notes. “Phosphorous is more important in the Great Lakes
than it is in the Gulf of Mexico. You have a reservoir of nutrients in the lake
because [although] there has been tremendous nutrient management in the Great
Lakes since the early 1970s, it really hasn’t improved the way managers thought
it would.
“A lot of it has
to do with the residual memory of the system and all of the pollutants that it
built up in the sediments,” Diaz continues. “It’s going to take a long time
before they actually work their way out of the system. What you are seeing there
is a store of nutrients in the sediments that keep being recycled and creating
low oxygen, much to the dismay of the managers who thought they’d have it under
control by now.”
The third-largest
dead zone is in the Chesapeake Bay. “About 25% of the nitrogen that enters the
bay is air and is from whatever puts nitrogen in the air—burning fossil fuels,
cars,” says Diaz. “The rest is split between agriculture and
sewage.”
Each region has
scientists working diligently to identify dead zones and their
causes.
The Largest Zone—and
Growing
The Gulf of Mexico
was the first area to be named a dead zone by Nancy Rabalais, dubbed the “Queen
of the Dead Zones” in the scientific community. She’s a professor and executive
director of the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium.
Her husband, R.
Eugene Turner, is a professor with the Coastal Ecology Institute and Department
of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences in the School of the Coast and Environment
at Louisiana State University.
In studying the
Gulf of Mexico’s hypoxia, Turner says, “What I expect this year is that there’ll
be a pretty large [dead] zone in the summer. I don’t know what the impact of the
storms are going to be until we measure it.”
Although the
nitrogen in the large discharge emanating from the Mississippi River has been
diluted a bit, “there’s a lot of farmland that’s been added,” he says. “Last
year it was 19%, and it may be down to only half of that this year, but it’s got
a lot of nitrate in it—more than we usually have. So we have a high
concentration and a high discharge.” This situation explains the expansion of
the dead zone into the Texas Gulf region, adds Turner.
Hypoxia takes on
a different twist in its definition among various regions. “We use an
operational definition of two milligrams per liter oxygen on the bottom
layer—what’s close to the sediment,” says Turner, adding that this is a
definition accepted by the fishing industry. “The reason we use that is because
that’s about the time when about anything that can get out of there will leave.
The fish and shrimp can’t be found in there.
“It’s driven by
the reaction of the organisms; if you get even lower than that, then other
things start to happen,” Turner says. “Animals can’t leave, so they get
stressed. But maybe they’ll revive if it doesn’t go any lower. And at some
point, if there’s no oxygen, the whole area—even bacteria—will get wiped out,
although there will always be some bacteria that won’t
be.”
The predominant
cause of runoff problems leading to dead zones in the Gulf region is
agricultural fertilizing practices, Turner says: “Particularly corn, which uses
about two-thirds of the fertilizer in the US. It is the dominant crop in the
watershed.”
And it has become
even more dominant: from 2006 to 2007, the area in the US dedicated to corn
production increased to 90 million acres in response to the demand for
ethanol.
Hypoxia is not
the only concern in the Gulf region; the accompanying water-quality issues are
also a concern, Turner says. The organic matter that takes up oxygen causes
hypoxia. “But some of that organic matter isn’t burned up all in that year and
is stored in the sediment, so in the following year, that legacy effect is
adding to the hypoxia potential,” he explains. “That means there’s more hypoxia
for the same amount of oxygen loading each year, and it builds
up.”
Nutrients in Lake
Erie
At the Stone
Laboratory and the Ohio Sea Grant College Program, researchers are working with
federal and state agencies to develop new techniques to remove microcystin, a
toxin from algae, at water treatment plants; determine the sources of phosphorus
entering Lake Erie; and determine the role of nitrogen in the process, among
other measures.
“It is very
important that we succeed in these efforts to allow Lake Erie to remain the most
productive of the Great Lakes and Ohio’s most valuable natural resource,” writes
Jeffrey Reutter, the director of the program and
laboratory.
Lake Erie also is
an immense economic resource in the region, supporting a charter fishing fleet
in Ohio of about 800 licensed captains, accounting for approximately 40% of all
the licenses in the Great Lakes.
In a paper
Reutter wrote addressing the situation in January, he points out that Lake Erie,
the southernmost of the five Great Lakes, annually produces more fish for human
consumption than the other four Great Lakes combined.
That comes as a
result of it being the most shallow of the Great Lakes at 210 feet deep. It is
also the warmest, and the one receiving the most nutrients from agricultural and
sewage sources. It also receives more sediment.
In contrast, the
watersheds around the other four Great Lakes have extensive forest
ecosystems.
Lake Erie
receives 80% of its water from the Detroit River, 10% from precipitation, and
10% from the rivers and streams surrounding it.
The Maumee River,
which drains an extensively farmed area, is the largest tributary to the Great
Lakes, with the Detroit River considered to be a connecting channel,
although it brings in only 3% of the
flow to Lake Erie, with the rest of the Great Lakes system fed by many small
tributaries.
In contrast to
the small flow percentage, the Maumee River brings in more sediment to Lake Erie
than all of the tributaries contribute to Lake Superior, which, at a depth of
1,333 feet, contains 20 times more water than Lake Erie.
Lake Erie is
divided into three basins:
- The shallow Western Basin
near Sandusky, OH, with an average depth of 24 feet and an irregular
bottom
- The deep Eastern Basin near
Erie, OH, with an irregular bottom
- The moderately deep Central
Basin between the two, with an average depth of 60 feet
The Western Basin
is the warmest during the summer and receives the most nutrients and sediment.
When Lake Erie stratifies during the summer, the thermocline—the transition
layer above which the water is warmer, and below which the temperature decreases
rapidly—normally forms at a depth of about 45 to 50 feet. The Western Basin
seldom has a thermocline, and the cold bottom layer, or hypolimnion, beneath the
thermocline in the Central Basin is thin—about 10 feet.
If Lake Erie is
consequently too productive from receiving too many nutrients, it is likely the
dissolved oxygen in the Central Basin hypolimnion will be used up during the
summer, creating an area of anoxia—the dead zone.
This changes the
chemistry within the hypolimnion, causing it to move from an oxidizing
environment to a reducing environment, which allows phosphorus and metals in the
sediment to dissolve into the water.
“I would argue
that the most important problems facing the Lake Erie ecosystem right now are
harmful algal blooms (HABs), aquatic invasive species (AIS), the dead zone,
sediment loading, and nutrient loading (phosphorus and nitrogen from point and
nonpoint sources or sewage and agriculture),” Reutter
writes.
The dead zone is
a Central Basin issue. HABs are a Western Basin issue and a significant human
health issue (Microcystis sp. is a form of blue-green algae that produces
the toxin microcystin and requires warm, nutrient-rich water that is found in
the Western Basin).
While
Microcystis is native to Lake Erie, it rarely became a
dominant species prior to 1996, according to Reutter. Since 1996, it has been
blooming each year in late summer with blooms starting in Maumee Bay and
Sandusky Bay where phosphorus levels are highest and the water is warmest—common
requirements of blue-green algae.
“It also appears
that zebra and quagga mussels are serving as catalysts,” Reutter adds. “When the
mussels suck in Microcystis in their normal filter feeding process, they
stop filtering, spit it out, and then resume filtering. In so doing, they remove
the things that compete with Microcystis, allowing it to bloom.”
While eliminating
the dead zone and HABs are admirable goals, the latter is most critical and
practical, says Reutter.
“Eliminating the
dead zone is likely to require very large reductions in the amount of phosphorus
entering the lake,” he explains. “As climate change causes the lake to become
warmer and water levels to go down, oxygen will be used more quickly and the
Central Basin hypolimnion will become thinner (less volume) and contain less
oxygen.
“Therefore, it
will likely become impossible to reduce phosphorus loading enough to eliminate
the dead zone,” Reutter adds. “Furthermore, we are finding evidence that the
dead zone may have existed for hundreds of years simply due to the shape of Lake
Erie.”
HABs directly
affect human health, and reducing nutrient loading enough to eliminate them is
much more feasible action, Reutter says.
“This will also
reduce the magnitude of the Central Basin Dead Zone, for much of this blue-green
algae floats out of the Western Basin and into the Central Basin where it sinks
to the bottom and consumes oxygen as it is decomposed by bacteria,” he writes.
“If we produce less algae, there is less to be decomposed and use oxygen in the
dead zone.”
Grim Outlook for the
Chesapeake Bay
The news in the
Chesapeake Bay region is poor, reports Beth McGee, a senior water-quality
scientist for the Chesapeake Bay Foundation. Recent reports show that nearly 90%
of the bay and its tidal tributaries had insufficient levels of dissolved
oxygen.
“The bay is one
of the only areas that has developed dissolved oxygen criteria that varies
spatially and temporally through the bay and tidal rivers,” says McGee. “For
example, at the bottom, they would allow a lower level of oxygen in terms of
water-quality standards than they would at the surface, reflecting the natural
system itself. The deeper levels naturally have lower levels of oxygen than
surface waters do.
“In other words,
in many areas of the country they want to see dissolved oxygen at five parts per
million; in the bay, we’ve crossed that out by saying we would allow it to go as
low as two parts per million in deep waters, but we expect it to be five or
greater at the surface waters. When the EPA puts out the report, they’re
basically comparing it to these time-varying dissolved oxygen
standards.”
In the Chesapeake
Bay, the predominantly serious areas of concern focus on the stem of the bay,
says McGee.
“In any given
summer, the dead zone can extend from near Baltimore south to about the mouth of
the York River,” she says. “And a lot of the big river systems also have
problems—the Potomac River in particular has a large dead zone. Almost all of
our tidal rivers—particularly those on the western shore that are particularly
deep—have a dead zone during the summer.”
The predominant
cause of the Chesapeake Bay dead zone is too much nitrogen and phosphorous
pollution, says McGee.
About 40% of the
nitrogen coming into the bay is from agriculture, and some 20% comes from point
sources, mostly sewage treatment plants, notes McGee.
Another large
contributing factor is air, she adds.
“About a quarter
to a third of the nitrogen pollution coming into the bay actually comes from the
air, primarily from coal-fired power plants and automobiles,” McGee says.
“Another small factor is urban stormwater and septic systems, but the top three
sources of nitrogen pollution are point source, agriculture, and
air.”
Weather is
another factor influencing the size of a dead zone from year to year, McGee
adds.
“If we get a lot
of rain coming in the springtime, that tends to drive the system during the
summer,” she says. “Regardless, because of all the manmade impacts on the bay,
weather has an influence, but it has a bigger influence than it should because
of the way we’ve altered the landscape.”
The impact on the
ecosystem and the economies derived from it is immense, says
McGee.
“Last summer, up
to 90% of the water was basically off limits for aquatic life,” she says.
“Animals that can move away from that water—like fish and crabs—are then
concentrated in certain areas.”
One example of a
fish that gets squeezed out is the rockfish.
“It doesn’t like
really warm water, so in the summer it is trying to go to deeper waters where it
is cooler, but what they find at the bottom where it is cooler is there’s no
oxygen in the water,” says McGee. “They basically get squeezed between the
warmer water at the surface that they don’t like and the cooler water at the
bottom that they don’t like because of the low dissolved
oxygen.
“Animals are
stressed when they don’t have enough oxygen and are crowded into little spaces.
We are seeing that in our fisheries. With our crabs, that certainly has been a
factor.”
Economic
Effects
The consequence of
the dead zones’ impact on the environment has a ripple effect on the
economy.
The restrictions
on fishing for crabs in Chesapeake Bay will potentially force many watermen out
of business, says McGee.
“And it’s going
to have effects on the local community that the watermen live in, because the
fishing industry is an economic engine,” she points out. “There are crab-picking
houses and crab restaurants. It’s definitely going to have an impact on the
economy. We rely on a lot of recreational fishing to bring tourist dollars into
this region, and if our fisheries aren’t healthy, we’re going to start to see
the impacts of that.”
It’s like a recurring nightmare in the region.
“It’s been a way of life,” notes McGee. “Chesapeake
Bay used to be known for its oysters, and when the oysters were decimated by
disease, water quality, and over-fishing, a lot of watermen switched over to
crabs.
“This region is known for blue crabs, and if we don’t
have that anymore, we lose more than just a fishery, we lose a way of
life—something that has been an integral part of the culture in this region.
They’ll be importing them from some other place in the world.”
Diaz says that it’s difficult to pin down the effects
of dead zones on economies. However, he cites the example of economic loss
encountered in Europe where hypoxia started in the 1980s in a
4,000-square-kilometer area between Sweden and Denmark that will no longer
support a lobster fishery because the oxygen is so poor lobsters cannot
survive.
“That’s a big loss, because if you’re going to be a
fisherman, you have to go farther or move your boat,” Diaz points out. “I
understand the same thing has happened in the Gulf of Mexico where hypoxia tends
to draw the shrimp either near shore or off shore, but overall, the fishermen
have to go farther distances to catch them, because they are not in the places
where the oxygen is low.”
In the Black Sea during the 1980s, there was a
complete collapse of commercial troll fishing affecting about 20 species of fish
due to hypoxia, says Diaz.
“We haven’t seen that in the US yet, but there
probably are economic consequences, such as longer travel time and lower
catches,” he says. “It’s tough.”
On the other hand, some evidence suggests hypoxia
corrals species and makes them easier to catch, says Diaz. This became apparent
with crabs in North Carolina following a series of hurricanes at the turn of the
century.
“There was a large hypoxic event, and the crabs
avoided it and moved downriver and congregated. They were easier for the
fishermen to catch, so it actually depressed the population of crabs to the
extent that it caused their numbers to drop,” he says.
The major economic and ecological consequences of the
dead zones imply that “it doesn’t seem to be very good stewardship to have these
zones the size of Massachusetts forming,” says Turner.
The damage to the shrimp industry is immense, he
adds.
Dead zones force the shrimp crews to travel longer
distances to find the shrimp against the current backdrop of higher fuel costs,
which is the largest cost of doing business, notes Turner.
In their quest to keep looking for shrimp in areas not
hit by hypoxia, shrimp-fishing companies have to cut back on their labor and
other operating costs in order to have more money to spend on fuel.
“They are in a marginal economic existence as it is,”
says Turner, adding that shrimpers’ numbers have decreased of late. “We don’t
know how much of that is from the hypoxia.”
Water quality
certainly is an issue, Turner says. “What’s driving the hypoxia is the nitrate
concentration in the discharge, but the silica that’s delivered is also
important, because it’s used by the diatoms [a type of phytoplankton]. When the
ratio gets to be 1:1 or lower, you start to lose the food web that supports all
those fisheries.”
It’s happened in European systems, Turner says.
“We’re right at the level at which the food web
occasionally goes below that, and you can see the food web change,” he says. “If
that happens in more than a month or two, it’s going to change all the
fisheries. They would all be in serious trouble.”
The Role of
Stormwater Management
Stormwater management plans can play a pivotal role in
influencing dead zones, says Diaz.
“Any reduction in organic material or nutrients
entering the system would be a relief, particularly in the Chesapeake Bay or
even in the Great Lakes and Boston Harbor,” he says. “There were problems in the
inner harbor that were due, for the most part, to people and sewage. Through
intense nutrient management, Boston Harbor has completely turned around with
collection of sewage and with the start of an ocean outfall in 2000. I
understand that in the next year or two, they are going to have all of the
stormwater drains running through the treatment plant, too. So, every bit
helps.”
As for stormwater management, Turner points out that
while the nitrogen load is what drives the size of a dead zone, “anything that
stormwater management people can do to reduce the nitrogen load will be
helpful.
“It’s not just an issue of at the end of the pipe,
it’s also wherever the stormwater is discharging—the headwater quality issues,”
he adds. “It’s definitely not a fair thing to pit farmers against the stormwater
managers against the hypoxia. It’s really a general water-quality issue all over
the world.”
Runoff reduction is important to alleviate the
problem, Turner says.
Although 15% of the Chesapeake Bay’s total nitrogen
pollution now comes from urban and suburban stormwater, McGee expects that
number to grow as the region’s population grows.
“That’s also going to be expensive to retrofit. We not
only need to be concerned with the existing stormwater and improving our
existing best management practices around stormwater, but also, because we
continue to develop in this region, we need to be conscious of new developments
going in and forward-thinking in terms of how we manage our stormwater,” she
says.
Looking ahead, McGee sees plenty of opportunities for
municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) to be treated like point sources.
“They are given these permits in a TMDL [total maximum daily load]. They are
considered part of the waste load allocation, not part of the load allocation,
so one thing we’ve been working hard on in this region is to try to get the
state’s environmental protection agency to put numeric limits in MS4 permits,
which we think will then drive the reductions we need to get from MS4,” she
says.
“That’s the way we can take advantage of existing
regulations. We also think that, given that many of the activities related to
new construction and development are also permitted activities, there’s room for
both EPA and the state to be doing more to try to reduce pollution from that
source.”
One of the vehicles to address the problem going
forward will come through the nation’s Farm Bill, says Turner.
“The farm payments actually are the net gain for a lot
of farms,” he says. “Their expenses are more than their profits, so the Farm
Bill pays their profit. If you wanted to affect land use, you could direct where
you wanted to pay the payments. This is an instrument to help direct land-use
patterns.”
Corn is rough on soil, and runoff occurs easily, says
Turner.
“It’s bare soil for three to four months, and any
fertilizer you’ve used comes off,” he says. “It’s not a very effective sponge
for applied fertilizer. But there are other plants that have perennial root
systems, such as soy beans.”
To back out of the hypoxia situation will take a long
time, says Turner. Additionally, it will require a sense of stewardship among
farmers with respect to their business practices.
“It’s
not just an issue of nitrates and hypoxia—it’s a stewardship issue, it’s
fishermen, local water-quality issues, and also how we farm as a nation,” he
says. “It isn’t going to get addressed satisfactorily without wanting to take
into account this legacy effect.”